Whizzing through my reading now! I had downloaded “Vanish” the 5th book in Tess Gerritsen’s Rizzoli and Isles series, to my Kindle some time ago but not got round to reading it so now seemed as good a time as any.
“Vanish” is a book of two halves really, it’s difficult to say much without spoilers, which I always try to avoid. Basically, the first half is about a hostage situation at the hospital and the second half sees our characters trying to pull apart a potential conspiracy surrounding the hostage takers.
I really enjoyed this. Thanks to a long wait at a hospital appointment myself, in pretty much the same department that the hostage situation was taking place in the book, I managed to get through it in a couple of days. The case was extremely interesting and whilst I wouldn’t say I’m a conspiracy nut I found the plot believable and could imagine things like that actually happening.
I loved the character based plot as well, again I’m trying to avoid spoilers here so don’t want to say too much but I liked seeing the further developments between Rizzoli and her husband, Agent Dean. I must admit, with each of these books that I read I find myself enjoying the differences between the books and the TV show more and more. At the moment, the relationship between Dr Isles and Detective Rizzoli doesn’t seem as close as it is on the TV show but I’m only on book 5 so I’m sure they’ll continue to grow closer.
As usual, when the book ended I found myself wondering what happened to some of the characters after the events of the book. I do this a lot. I’m always intrigued by what’s happening where we can’t see; what happened before the book started; what happened during the time that isn’t described within the book; and what happened after it finished? Does anyone else do this?
I’m looking forward to reading book 6 at some point, might even add it to my Christmas list. Really enjoying the fact that I’m so behind with this series so can always get hold of a new one without having to wait for the next one to be released.
I’ve been busy preparing for a taekwondo exam so not really been doing any personal reading for the last month or so. I treated myself to Cecelia Ahern’s new book, “The Marble Collector” to celebrate being able to read whatever I wanted again.
I am never disappointed by Ahern’s books and I certainly wasn’t disappointed with “The Marble Collector”. The main characters are Sabrina Boggs and her Father, Fergus. Fergus recently had a stroke and whilst he is recovering in a care home he has a lot of memory problems. Sabrina receives some boxes of his possessions, including an astounding number of marbles, all catalogued and valued but with some of the most expensive collections missing. This sets in motion the events for the rest of the book.
“The Marble Collector” is split between Sabrina’s perspective, where we see her unravelling her Father’s life to try and find the missing marbles, and Fergus’ perspective, which is initially told as flashbacks but eventually catches up with the present. I loved the way the split perspective worked, we could see all the things about Fergus’ past that Sabrina didn’t know and was desperate to find out. It also gets you thinking about how well you can truly know a person, even a relative. I think if we were honest with ourselves we’ve probably all got things we keep to ourselves and I would say most people probably adapt their behaviour slightly depending on the people they are with at the time so it’s not really that unusual. Obviously, I don’t think everyone is keeping secrets to the extent that Fergus is but very few people are completely open and honest about every aspect of their life all the time.
There was less magic about “The Marble Collector” than most of Ahern’s books have but, to be honest, I don’t think it needed it. The peripheral characters were as well written as the main characters, although limited by the fact that the book was written in first person narrative so we only saw the other characters from the perspectives of Sabrina and Fergus. There were a few moments when I felt I wanted to know more about how some of the other characters really felt without it being skewed by the narrator’s perspective but that’s always the downside to first person narrative.
Overall, an excellent addition to Ahern’s collection and a brilliant first book back for me after my reading break.
The second book I bought at the airport on my way to New York was Irvine Welsh’s “The Sex Lives of Siamese Twins”. I’ve read several of his books previously and my Dad had read this one just prior to us going away and recommended it so I decided to give it a go.
I think this is the first of Welsh’s books that I’ve read that wasn’t set in Scotland. Instead it’s set in Miami, mainly the South Beach area. The main characters are Lucy Brennan, a Personal Trainer, and Lena Sorensen, an extremely overweight artist with self-esteem issues. Lucy and Lena’s lives cross paths when Lucy stops a gunman one night on an overpass and Lena films it on her phone and later tracks Lucy down and signs on as her client.
I loved this book. I can identify in part with both Lucy and Lena. I have long struggled with my weight and now religiously track my calorie consumption with a diet app on my phone. Lucy’s actions in the book may be ridiculously extreme but we see that they come from a good place and she’s not without her demons herself. I think it does show that everybody has their own issues and nobody is as perfect as you might think they are.
“The Sex Lives of Siamese Twins” does take a bit to get down to the nitty gritty but I enjoyed seeing the build-up and seeing Lucy’s behaviour start to escalate. It’s difficult to say more without spoiling it. I did feel the ending seemed somewhat rushed in comparison to the length of time spent on the build up. Felt a little like he didn’t want the book to get too long so he quickly rounded it off.
I’m also not keen on the lack of speech marks. I know it’s a daft thing but it took me a few pages to get used to the fact that there aren’t speech marks and he uses dashes instead to signify the start of someone speaking. It is only a small thing though and once I was in to the flow of the book I barely even noticed anymore.
I would definitely recommend this to any fans of Welsh’s work but if you’re someone who is just considering trying an Irvine Welsh book for the first time, this isn’t the best example to start you off.
I am always on the lookout for Jodi Picoult’s latest books coming out in paperback so when I saw “Leaving Time” whilst I was doing my shopping I just had to have it. I also manage to avoid reading reviews of Picoult’s books as I don’t want the book to be spoiled if I find out too much about the plot.
“Leaving Time” is told from several different viewpoints, as a lot of Picoult’s books are. In this case there is Jenna, a 13 year old girl who is looking for her Mother who has been missing since she was 3 years old; Alice, Jenna’s Mother, who’s story we get to see from before Jenna was even born; Serenity, a Psychic Jenna approaches to try and find out if her Mother is dead; and lastly, Virgil, a former Police Detective and current alcoholic Private Investigator who Jenna also approaches for help in looking for her Mother.
I like the way Picoult uses the different narrators so the reader can see more than one viewpoint on the story. Often when stories are told in first person narrative it can narrow the focus as the reader only gets to see one view of the story and all the events of the book will be skewed to the way that one characters looks at things. By splitting the narrative in this way we get to see more of the story and more viewpoints on the events that are happening.
“Leaving Time” was different from most of Picoult’s other books in that there was no court case involved in this one. Most of her books involve some kind of socially divisive issue that we are introduced to in the first part of the book and then a Court case in the second part in order to decide the outcome. That is not the case with this book. It’s difficult to say more without ruining the ending for anyone who hasn’t read this as yet. I did not see the events at the end coming until they happened, I will say that. I also hadn’t figured out the “whodunit” aspect of the book either until it became obvious, which is unusual for me.
I really enjoyed this book, it gave me a lot to think about and kept me guessing until the very end.
I bought “Our Story” by Reggie and Ronnie Kray with Fred Dinenage at the airport on my way to New York as I knew the film about them “Legend” was going to be released shortly and I thought I would read up a little more about them before I saw the film.
Regular readers of my blog will know that true crime is a bit of a passion of mine and I especially like books written by criminals or victims as I think sometimes you get a more accurate look at the crime than in books written by outsiders. That being said, sometimes people so close to the crime don’t make for the most reliable narrators, especially if the books are written by the criminals.
As “Our Story” is told by both the Kray twins they take it in turns at telling their story and obviously each cover the parts that are most relevant to them. I knew the basic story of the Krays, how they ran the East End of London back in the 1960s and were considered to be extremely violent but I hadn’t really read much in depth about their story until now. I didn’t realise that although they were both given life sentences with a minimum tariff of 30 years, they were actually only each convicted of one count of murder and one count of conspiracy to commit murder. Considering the sentences that are handed down for, to my mind, much more serious offences it does seem a ridiculous length of time. As it turned out, Ronnie would never see freedom; he died in Broadmoor in 1995 at the age of 61; and Reggie would only see a few months of freedom when he was released from prison on compassionate grounds after being diagnosed with terminal cancer. He died in 2000 at the age of 66.
I would say this book is probably not an entirely unbiased account of their lives. Whilst it doesn’t glorify what they did, both of them admit that they deserved to go to prison it is the length of the sentences that they disputed, there aren’t many stories about things that perhaps went wrong for them. Obviously they had a reputation to protect as they have continued to profit from their high profile whilst in prison and hospital and wouldn’t want to release any stories that could damage that revenue stream.
“Our Story” is a very well put together book and whilst it doesn’t go into a great lot of detail about their personal lives it does give you a bit of an insight into what life was like for them and exactly what their crimes were all about. I can see how they saw themselves as men of honour. They lived by a very strict code, they didn’t hurt women or children and they didn’t hurt anyone who, in their eyes, didn’t deserve it. Indeed the 2 men they were convicted of killing were other gangsters who they felt had got out of hand and were no longer living by their code.
I don’t think this is the book to read if you already know a fair bit about the Krays as there isn’t really much new information contained in it but it was interesting to see their lives through their eyes and I’m definitely going to try and read a little more about the Krays in the future.
“The Diary of a Young Girl” by Anne Frank is on my list of 50 books to read before I die and will also count on my 2015 reading challenge as a book from my childhood as I first read it when I was a kid.
I’m sure most of you will know the story of Anne Frank and her family. Anne was a 13 year old Jewish girl, living with her parents and her older sister, Margot, in Amsterdam during World War II. On 6th July 1942, Anne and her family went into hiding at 263 Prinsengracht, soon followed by the van Daan family and later by Albert Dussel. On 4th August 1944, the property is raided following an anonymous phone call to the Security Police. All the inhabitants of the annexe are taken to concentration camps, Otto Frank is the only one to survive. The identity of the person who gave the anonymous tip has never been discovered. The 2 men, Victor Kugler and Johannes Kleiman, who had been helping them stay hidden are also arrested and questioned. Miep Gies and Bep Voskuijl are left behind and manage to rescue Anne’s diary from the annexe and keep it safe until Otto Frank returns.
Anne’s diary starts before the family have gone into hiding and we see a brief glimpse of the struggle faced by Jewish people having to live within the strict laws imposed by Hitler. After the family have gone into hiding we are then given a very personal insight into what life was like for Jews in hiding and the people who help them.
Anne comes across as an extremely self-aware young woman. I don’t remember being anywhere near as confident as she is when I was 13. Every time I read her diary and read her aspirations for the future I am saddened that her life was so unfairly ended at such a young age. I can’t imagine how proud she would be to see the reception her diary got and how many people all over the world have used her account to better understand the plight of the Jews during that awful time.
Although I may complain about things that happen in my life, overall I am extremely fortunate and reading Anne’s story always reminds me just how fortunate I am. I cannot imagine being trapped in a secret area of a building 24 hours a day for 2 years like Anne was; constantly fearful of discovery and unable to do any of the things a normal girl her age could do. It’s no wonder Anne feels she matured very quickly during her time in hiding, she had responsibilities that no young girl should ever have. She knew if she made too much noise at the wrong time of day they could be discovered and that the lives of the other 7 people in hiding, as well as their friends on the outside who were helping them stay hidden, relied on her following the rules to the absolute letter.
I think the writing itself is very good, I know a lot of work has been done in translating the diary but her writing is very descriptive and she manages to paint an extremely clear picture of her time in the “Secret Annexe” and what life was like for her and the others.
I often find myself wondering what Anne would be like if she’d survived and was alive today. What would she think of how the world has changed since the war? Would she have made it as a journalist like she wanted? Would she have changed her diary in any way prior to publication? I don’t think she could ever have foreseen how important her diary would become.
After it was mentioned in “Hearts in Atlantis” I decided to re-read William Golding’s “Lord of the Flies”. I read this as part of my GCSE English back when I was at school but haven’t read it since.
Maybe it’s because I’m older or maybe it’s because I was choosing to read it this time rather than being forced to read it and having to analyse every word for my GCSE English but I enjoyed this much more than I remember doing the first time around.
Having read this immediately after “Hearts in Atlantis” I could definitely see the links between the two. I also found myself wondering how much the events of “Lord of the Flies” were a product of the time it was written and whether if it was written now the same story would be as plausible. How would the children of today, who are extremely reliant on social media and computer devices, manage if they were dropped onto an island like that with nothing? Would they know how to build a shelter without being able to Google how to do it? Would they realise they needed to build a fire as a signal because they couldn’t just go on Facebook and alert people to their predicament?
One thing I do think would be the same would be the division within the camp. I don’t want to sound harsh but I think there will always be children who want to elevate themselves above others and pick on people who they see as different. Piggy comes up with most of the good ideas in “Lord of the Flies” but it’s Ralph who the other children elect as Leader and Jack is the only other person who is seen as a challenger for that role. If Piggy wasn’t overweight and asthmatic I have no doubt he would have been taken more seriously. Even though it shouldn’t matter, it’s clear that appearances do make a difference to how people perceive you. Even Ralph, who is the friendliest towards him, betrays him by telling the others the kids at school called him Piggy after he expressly asked that he not be called that. Jack might be the first to instigate bullying against him but Ralph betrays that confidence without so much as a second thought.
It is remarkable how quickly things devolve on the island. As regular readers will know, I like to keep my reviews spoiler free so I won’t mention too much but I remember being quite shocked the first time I read it at how bad things get and how far some of the kids are willing to go. There’s no real idea of how long they have been on the island but it’s long enough that it’s mentioned that their hair has grown enough that it starts getting in their way.
Another thing that has always intrigued me about “Lord of the Flies” is what would have happened if there had been girls on the island as well or even if it had been all girls. Would the same issues have arisen and would the outcome have been the same? If you’ve got any thoughts of this let me know in the comments.